Case study · Logistics
TraceBolt
Full material traceability on a distributed ledger.
- Client
- TraceBolt
- Service
- Design and development
- Sector
- Supply chain
- Ledger
- Distributed
At a glance
What it makes visible
Across the chain, for developers and suppliers, rather than at the handover points only.
Chosen because the parties sharing the record do not share an owner.
Developers and suppliers work in the same application rather than reconciling two.
Built as a system suppliers will actually use, which is the usual failure point.
The brief
Traceability systems fail on the supplier's side
Material traceability is a solved problem on paper and an unsolved one in practice. The reason is almost never the technology. It is that the party being asked to enter the data — the supplier — gets the least benefit from doing it, so compliance decays and the record becomes partial, which makes it worthless.
So the brief is not really a ledger problem. It is: build something suppliers will actually use, and the transparency follows.
A traceability record is only as good as the least-motivated party entering data into it.
The build
Why the ledger is distributed
The choice of a distributed ledger follows from who the users are. A traceability record spanning developers and suppliers is shared by parties with no common owner and genuine reasons to distrust a record one of them controls. A distributed ledger removes the question of whose database it is.
But that is the easy half. The application exists to surface the datasets stakeholders need to make informed decisions — which means the product's job is interpretation, not storage. A ledger nobody can read is a compliance artefact.
And the design constraint stated up front is the one that decides whether any of it works: a system suppliers will actually use. Wow Labz designed and developed the application.
What it does
Three things at once
Transparency across the chain
Making the material supply chain transparent and efficient, with the record covering the chain rather than stopping at each organisational boundary.
Traceability for both sides
Full traceability managed for developers and suppliers together, so the same record serves the party demanding it and the party supplying it.
The datasets stakeholders need
A distributed ledger surfacing the specific data each stakeholder needs to make an informed decision, rather than a raw log they have to interpret.
Stack
What it was built with
Questions
TraceBolt, answered
What is TraceBolt?
A supply chain management application built to make the material supply chain transparent and efficient, managing full traceability for developers and suppliers on a distributed ledger.
Why use a distributed ledger?
Because the record is shared between parties with no common owner. A distributed ledger removes the question of whose database holds the truth, which is a precondition for both sides trusting it.
Who uses it?
Developers and suppliers, working in the same system rather than maintaining separate records that have to be reconciled.
What was the main design constraint?
Building something suppliers will actually use. Traceability systems usually fail because the party entering the data benefits least from doing it, so adoption rather than technology is the real problem.
Let's talk
Got a developer product nobody finishes integrating?
Tell us what you are building. We will tell you how we would ship it.
